| On differences in oppression, derailment, and the hierarchies of hurt |
On differences in oppression, derailment, and the hierarchies of hurt
|
Apr. 5th, 2009 @ 03:38 pm
|
|---|
|
|
|
Re: ... deep breath ...
|
(Link) |
|
Well, it seems to me one has a few alternatives. Two of them are to be nice, polite and somewhat tentative (according to your fashion), and to simply be unbearably correct and defensible about everything (in which case it doesn't matter so much if one is nice). And there's the spectrum in between, and there's many other factors. But when is neither nice, nor particularly right (as in my case yesterday), there's a blood in the water effect.
![[User Picture Icon]](https://v2.dreamwidth.org/455761/447961) |
| From: | alias_sqbr |
| Date: |
April 7th, 2009 11:03 am (UTC) |
|
|
Re: ... deep breath ...
|
(Link) |
|
simply be unbearably correct and defensible about everything
Nice work if you can get it :D
But that's the thing: even if you're correct you also have to be unambiguous, because if there's another interpretation of your words which is incorrect (or racist or whatever) people will often interpret you (or at least me :/) that way, and if they don't know you (and your tendency to be almost-but-not-quite always right :)) it's entirely reasonable for them to do so.
Of course unambiguous is not necessarily the same as nice.
|
|
| Top of Page |
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios |