Moments of Permanence - The White Person's Guide To Working Out If They're Racist

About The White Person's Guide To Working Out If They're Racist

Previous Entry The White Person's Guide To Working Out If They're Racist Apr. 10th, 2011 @ 03:39 pm Next Entry

Leave a comment
[User Picture Icon]
From:[personal profile] sami
Date: April 13th, 2011 04:40 am (UTC)

Re: My possibly completely wrong opinion

(Link)
It's not necessarily a post intended to "serve a purpose", in any grand sense. It's more that I'm sick of - and at the time I wrote it, was intensely aggravated by, while off my meds - people using arguments like "this is a dictionary definition of racism that I don't fit" to excuse whatever it is they're doing that's actually totally racist.

As a post, it boils down to: no, none of that stuff applies.

Group 1, the "But I am not a racist!" people, is more or less the group this post is intended to tell to shut up. I'm not trying to divide the world into racists and not-racists, I'm trying to say that if people say you're a racist, that's probably because you're being racist, and none of those excuses listed mean anything.

Because the thing is the people who insist that they're tooootally not a racist, because :reasons in post:. Whereas my point is that those excuses are worth nothing, and if you're getting called a racist repeatedly, there's pretty much guaranteed to be a reason.

As far as definitions go... I do think it's possible to be white and not a racist, not least because I believe that it's not about what people think, it matters what they do - the reason why people should nonetheless evolve their thinking is because your thoughts influence your behaviour.

So if you have reached the point where you have no outwardly detectable signs of racist conditioning, even when it comes to things like Implicit Association testing... I'd argue that a person has at that point overcome racism, even if they occasionally have a momentary prejudicial thought.

Of course, the kyriarchy is trying to reinstall it constantly, so it's arguably a kind of "at that moment, and for that moment" thing, but still. One must always be on the watch, and analyse one's thoughts with care.

I had an odd moment like that yesterday. I had gone to the pharmacy (about 90 seconds' walk from our house), and was coming back, and as I was unlocking the door became aware of the dark-skinned man across the street who was standing on the side of the road, facing our house, talking into a mobile phone.

I thought he was acting suspiciously. Then I thought that was kind of a racist assumption. And then I parsed what he was saying, which was: "I'm telling you, she just got home. She's going in now. Just call the whole thing off." There was something more about a van, or something, but then he saw me looking at him and dropped to a crouch and lowered his voice.

So I concluded that it was likely to be more of that thing where, when unmedicated for ADHD, which I was, I tend to be subconsciously very aware of my surroundings, and I'd tracked that what he was doing was actually really kind of suspicious, and then I hurriedly went into my house and locked the door.

On reflection: was there a racist impulse behind that? Hard to say, since if I'd noticed a white dude behaving the exact same way I'd have reacted the exact same way. But would I have noticed a white dude as much? Also hard to say. What with our proximity to Subiaco Oval, public transport, King's Park, the block of Homeswest flats down the road, etc, I can say that I don't really make particular assumptions about economic or social class with any random person I see walking down the street, and I'm specifically wary of young white men as being likely to be football yobbos, because they're the demographic most likely to be tools around this street.

So probably yes, but only if he was under thirty-five.
[User Picture Icon]
From:[personal profile] sqbr
Date: April 14th, 2011 09:28 am (UTC)

Re: My possibly completely wrong opinion

(Link)
Ahhhh, ok. I was (a)Interrogating the text from the wrong perspective and (b)Using a different definition of "racist".

Never mind then :)
[User Picture Icon]
From:[personal profile] sami
Date: April 28th, 2011 01:37 am (UTC)

Re: My possibly completely wrong opinion

(Link)
If you want to see someone *really* interrogating the text from a wrong perspective, look below, omg. Where someone has created an account for the sole purpose of replying anonymously and also includes "sexist" and "homophobic".

THEY'RE SURE I GET CALLED HOMOPHOBIC

You've known me more than ten years HOW OFTEN DO YOU THINK THAT'S HAPPENED IN THAT TIME
(Leave a comment)
Top of Page Powered by Dreamwidth Studios